Our Methodology
How we validate workforce programs using the 6-lens framework
01 / 06
Market Demand Analysis
We analyze real-time employer job postings, BLS growth projections, regional workforce gaps, and wage trends to determine if there's sustainable demand for your program's graduates.
02 / 06
Financial Viability
A CFO-level financial analysis evaluating startup costs, enrollment projections, break-even timeline, and 5-year ROI modeling.
03 / 06
Competitive Landscape
We map nearby program offerings, benchmark enrollment, analyze market saturation, and identify differentiation opportunities.
04 / 06
Curriculum Design
Alignment between your proposed curriculum and actual job requirements, industry credentials, optimal program length, and stackability pathways.
05 / 06
Workforce Alignment
Evaluation of employer partnership opportunities, work-based learning models, placement potential, and industry advisory engagement.
06 / 06
Marketing Strategy
Target audience identification, enrollment funnel design, channel recommendations, and launch campaign timeline.
THE FRAMEWORK
Powered by Confluence Labs
Our validation framework is built on Confluence Labs' multi-perspective analysis methodology—a structured approach to evaluating programs from multiple executive viewpoints simultaneously, grounded in real data and proven business frameworks.
PROGRAM OPPORTUNITY TICKER
The number is evidence. The action is analysis.
Every published metric carries a geography, comparison period, as-of date, confidence level, and link to its source of record. Wavelength calculates changes from structured values; it does not ask an AI model to invent or recall the number.
Factual claim
Employment, openings, wages, skills, completions, dates, and changes must resolve to a verified source record. Change claims require comparable periods.
Planning analysis
Implications and Explore, Validate, Update curriculum, Watch, or Avoid labels explain a reasonable next step. They are not forecasts or facts about your institution.
No evidence, no signal
Expired sources, unsupported geography, incomplete coverage, mismatched periods, and failed verification produce no opportunity instead of a sample or AI-filled substitute.
Public visitors receive national official-source signals. Regional and Local views require an active Institution Edition membership and a verified institutional geography. Licensed Lightcast comparisons qualify only when both periods are explicit and comparable.
SOURCE RECORD
The evidence behind the recommendation.
- Bureau of Labor Statistics employment projections
- O*NET occupational standards and skills
- Employer-demand and wage evidence
- U.S. Census demographic and economic data
- Institutional and industry source material
TRANSPARENCY COMMITMENT
A clear call, including when the answer is no.
Recommendations include citations, assumptions, limitations, and the conditions that would change the conclusion. If the evidence supports a no-go, we explain why.
Start a validation →